Measured against the operator’s own starting baseline, reconciled with their reporting at engagement close.
The operator ran 340 active SMB customer accounts, each running one or more fuel cards. Fuel-card balances were aging 30–180 days. Internal dispute handling was fragmented — each regional account manager ran their own escalation, with no centralized chronology or evidence packet.
The symptoms the operator came in with:
The intervention was a structured dispute resolution workflow plus documentation discipline — not a collection push. The principle: every account gets a per-account chronology, every disputed balance gets an evidence packet, every escalation follows a written path.
All figures measured against the operator’s starting baseline and reconciled with their reporting — composite across engagement patterns, not a single-client outcome.
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Dispute resolution cycle | 21 → 9 days |
| Net recovery on aged balances | 41¢ per dollar |
| Accounts retained | 78% (vs 20–30% typical post-collection) |
| Avoided early agency escalation fees | $180K+ |
| Aged AR ($485K cohort) | Cleared in 120 days |
| Disputed balances ($1.6M cohort) | Cleared across window |
Clear scope matters. Here is the exact boundary of the engagement.
Composite case. Industry, geography, and scale have been anonymized. Numerical outcomes are representative of actual engagement ranges but are not attributable to a single client. Published here so procurement can see the shape of the work — not to claim any individual outcome.
If you recognize the pattern — fragmented dispute handling, aged fuel-card or B2B balances, relationships getting damaged by inconsistent escalation — the pilot is the right first step. Qualification takes less than a week.
